Table of Contents

False Imprisonment and Malicious Prosecution: Meaning, Differences, and Legal Remedies

Reading Time: 2 minutes

Table of Contents

OVERVIEW

In this topic, we are going to learn about two concepts of tord which are named false Imprisonment and Malicious prosecution, where we will see some key elements and remedies which are granted by law. Let us begin with the topic. 

FALSE IMPRISONMENT

The term false imprisonment refers to a legal claim where a person is restrained and confined forcefully without his or her consent or against their will. Which is a civil wrong which means it is a tort in which a person got injured by someone forcefully and can ask for compensation for their injury.

Let us see its key elements which include,

  • The person should be forcefully confined and restrained by another person without the person’s will.
  • When the detention is caused without the consent of a person being restrained.
  • The confinement and restraint of a person should be done with any lawful authority and justification, for eg, without any warrant.
  • A person should be aware of the confinement and other causes of harm caused by it, but sometimes justification is not needed when harm is caused.
  • One example of false imprisonment is Locking a person in without his consent or willingness in a room and refusing to remove him.

Remedy 

  • Under false imprisonment cases, a victim can sue that person and can ask for compensation for harm caused to him which can be emotional, physical, or any financial loss.

MALICIOUS PROSECUTION

The term malicious prosecution refers to the legal claim where a person is wrongfully subjected to the criminal case, and civil case too without cause and malicious intentions. It is also a civil wrong that is a tort where a wrong party is allowed to seek damages.

Let us see some of its elements which include,

  • The defendant should initiate legal proceedings which can be both criminal or civil proceedings against the plaintiff.
  • The initiation of a case should be without probable cause and reasonable grounds.
  • The defendant should have acted in malice which had motives, and intentions like revenge, personal gain, etc.
  • The proceeding of the case should be done in the favour of the plaintiff which shows that the proceeding lacked merit.
  • The plaintiff should have caused damages which can be reputation, legal costs, etc.
  • One example of malicious prosecution is A falsely accusing B that he had committed the crime out of personal gain, which led B to wrongful arrest and caused harm to his reputation.

Remedy

  • The remedy under malicious prosecution is that the victim can take damages for the loss caused to him or her which includes, legal cost, reputation, distress, etc due to wrongful legal proceedings.

CONCLUSION

At the end of this topic, we have learned how false imprisonment deals with the confinement of an individual without his willingness, whereas malicious prosecution relates to wrongful use of the legal system for personal use which prosecutes someone with malice intention, and without probable cause. Both these concepts are serious in the law of tort which helps the victims by providing them compensation for their injury which is caused to them.

REFERENCES 

https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&opi=89978449&url=https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/false_imprisonment&ved=2ahUKEwivgvrkuOKGAxX9e2wGHYZUDw4QFnoECDUQAQ&usg=AOvVaw2HQHwA3Oak3ahkb6yLwCRO

 

Recommended YouTube Videos

The videos listed in this section are provided for informational purposes only. We do not endorse, verify, or take responsibility for the content, accuracy, or opinions expressed in these videos. The views and opinions expressed by the video creators are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views of this website. Please use your discretion when viewing and applying the information presented.

Contributors

We extend our heartfelt thanks to the following individuals for their contributions to above law notes. Their diverse perspectives and knowledge enrich our content. Click on their profiles to learn more about their backgrounds and expertise.

  • Tushar Garg avatar

    I am the Founder of Legitimate India, a platform dedicated to revolutionizing legal education and networking in India. My mission is to make legal education more affordable, accessible, and inclusive for students and professionals nationwide.Through Legitimate India, I aim to bridge the gap between aspiring legal professionals and seasoned experts by offering a comprehensive platform for connecting, learning, and growing. Though this platform is still in development, the vision is clear: to empower the legal community with innovative tools and opportunities.

Join the Legal Community!

Connect with fellow lawyers, law students, and legal professionals on our platform. Share updates, find job opportunities, enroll in courses, and collaborate on legal projects. Enhance your career and stay informed in the ever-evolving legal field. Join us today!”

Quick Links